In-Depth Analysis· Montreux Convention Black Sea Russia Ukraine Article 19 Türkiye

The Montreux Convention and the Black Sea: How Türkiye Applied the Straits Regime in the Russia–Ukraine War

How Türkiye applied the 1936 Montreux Convention in the Russia–Ukraine war: Article 19, limits on closing the Straits, Istanbul diplomacy and the grain deal.

WAR

By World Agenda Review Editorial Team

Published: October 26, 2026

⏱ 9 min read (1,979 words)

Executive Summary & Key Facts

The 1936 Montreux Convention gives Türkiye authority over the Bosporus and Dardanelles, but it regulates transit rather than granting a right to close the Straits at will.
Under Article 19, when Türkiye is not a belligerent, warships of states at war may not transit the Straits, with narrow exceptions such as returning to a home base.
Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu announced on 28 February 2022 that Ankara would implement Article 19 in the Russia–Ukraine war, and Türkiye says it applies the rule to all parties.
The Istanbul-based Black Sea Grain Initiative, signed on 22 July 2022 by Russia, Ukraine, Türkiye and the UN, moved roughly 33 million tonnes of grain and other food products before Russia declined to extend it in July 2023.
Montreux does not make Türkiye a party to the war or a neutral without duties: it must apply the rules evenly, and merchant shipping keeps its freedom of passage in wartime.

Why It Matters

The 1936 Montreux Convention gives Türkiye the role of custodian of the Turkish Straits, and Article 19 bars the warships of belligerent states from transiting when Türkiye is not itself at war. On 28 February 2022 Ankara announced that it would apply that rule to the Russia–Ukraine war, which limited naval reinforcement of the Black Sea. At the same time, Türkiye hosted high-level talks, facilitated prisoner exchanges and co-founded the Black Sea Grain Initiative. Understanding the Convention also means understanding its limits: Türkiye cannot simply shut the Straits to one party or to commercial shipping.

Background

From Lausanne to Montreux

The 1923 Lausanne Straits Convention demilitarized the Straits and placed them under an international commission. As European tensions rose in the 1930s, Türkiye requested a revision. The new Convention was signed at Montreux, Switzerland, on 20 July 1936 and entered into force on 9 November 1936. It restored Turkish control and the right to remilitarize the Straits. The original parties included Türkiye, the Soviet Union (whose successor in this regime is Russia), the United Kingdom, France, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Japan and Australia. Italy later acceded. Ukraine is not a signatory, but as a Black Sea littoral state it is directly affected. The United States is not a party.

What the Convention says

Peacetime (Articles 2–7): Merchant ships enjoy freedom of transit, subject to health and navigation rules.
Warships in peacetime (Articles 8–18): Non-Black Sea states face tonnage and notification limits. Eight days' notice is required from Black Sea states and fifteen days from others. Aircraft carriers are excluded from transit. Under Article 18, the aggregate tonnage of non-Black Sea states' warships in the Black Sea is capped, and their stay is limited to 21 days.
War, Türkiye not belligerent (Articles 19 and 4): Warships of belligerents may not pass, and merchant ships keep their freedom of transit.
War or imminent danger involving Türkiye (Articles 20–21): Türkiye's discretion over warship passage widens considerably.

What Article 19 actually provides

Article 19 bars warships of belligerent powers from the Straits when Türkiye is not at war, with three exceptions in the text:

Action under Article 25, which preserves obligations under the League of Nations Covenant.
Assistance to a victim of aggression under a mutual-assistance treaty that binds Türkiye and was concluded within the Covenant framework.
Belligerent warships that have become separated from their bases may return to them.

The third exception is the most debated in the Russia–Ukraine context. It allows a vessel to return to a home port, but it does not open the Straits to reinforcement.

Chronology of 2022–2025

Date	Event
24 Feb 2022	Russia launches its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
28 Feb 2022	Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu announces that Ankara assesses the situation as a war and will implement Article 19.
10 Mar 2022	Russian, Ukrainian and Turkish foreign ministers meet on the margins of the Antalya Diplomacy Forum.
29 Mar 2022	Russian and Ukrainian delegations hold talks in Istanbul.
22 Jul 2022	Black Sea Grain Initiative signed in Istanbul by Russia, Ukraine, Türkiye and the UN.
1 Aug 2022	First grain ship leaves Odesa under the Initiative.
Sept 2022	Prisoner exchange in which Ankara plays a role.
17 Jul 2023	Russia declines to extend the Initiative.
Jan 2024	Türkiye, Romania and Bulgaria agree a trilateral Black Sea mine-countermeasures arrangement.
May–Jul 2025	Direct Russian–Ukrainian rounds in Istanbul produce large prisoner exchanges but no ceasefire.

Key Players & Positions

Russia

Moscow says it respects the Montreux regime and has criticized Türkiye's commercial sale of Bayraktar drones to Ukraine. It has also complained that the second half of the July 2022 package, which concerned its own food and fertilizer exports, was not fully implemented. Moscow cited obstacles in banking, insurance and shipping, and it declined to extend the grain arrangement in July 2023. Russia also objected when Ukraine's Azov commanders, held in Türkiye under a prisoner-exchange understanding, returned to Ukraine in July 2023.

Ukraine

Kyiv asked Türkiye at the outset of the invasion to close the Straits to Russian warships. It welcomed the application of Article 19 and has sought a wider interpretation of it. Ukraine has also called for firmer limits on the return-to-base exception. It credits the Istanbul diplomacy with enabling grain exports and prisoner exchanges, and it later opened its own shipping corridor in the western Black Sea after the Initiative ended.

Western states and NATO

NATO members, including the United States and the United Kingdom, have generally welcomed Türkiye's application of Article 19 and its role in mediation and mine-clearance cooperation. Some Western commentators, however, have asked whether the return-to-base exception is read too broadly. Others note that Montreux also constrains NATO's own naval presence in the Black Sea, since Article 18 caps the tonnage and duration of non-littoral deployments.

Black Sea littoral states and the UN

Romania and Bulgaria are NATO members and Black Sea coastal states. They share mine-clearance responsibilities with Türkiye and have an interest in navigational safety. The United Nations co-signed the grain arrangement and ran the Joint Coordination Centre in Istanbul, where Russian, Ukrainian, Turkish and UN officials worked together to coordinate inspections and sailings.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

Ankara presents its conduct as principled implementation of a treaty, combined with active diplomacy. Its main points, tied to official sources, are these:

Montreux is applied impartially and in full. Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu's announcement on 28 February 2022, together with later Ministry of Foreign Affairs statements, says Article 19 is applied to all belligerents, and that requests from both Black Sea and non-Black Sea states have been assessed under the same text. Ankara says the return-to-base provision is a treaty exception it cannot disregard. The legal basis is Articles 19 and 20–21 of the 1936 Convention.
Territorial integrity and a diplomatic solution. According to the Presidency of the Republic and the MFA, Türkiye supports Ukraine's territorial integrity and does not recognize Crimea's annexation. It also holds that the war can only end through negotiation and has kept channels to both capitals open. It has not joined the Western sanctions regimes, citing its trade and energy interests.
Mediation as practice, not slogan. Türkiye points to the Antalya meeting of 10 March 2022, the Istanbul talks of 29 March 2022 and the 2025 Istanbul rounds. It also points to the Istanbul-based Joint Coordination Centre and its prisoner-exchange facilitation. The Presidency and the MFA describe the Black Sea Grain Initiative as a co-achievement with the UN, which moved roughly 33 million tonnes of grain to global markets.
Montreux is a pillar of regional security, not a tool of any one camp. Ankara argues that the Convention has kept the Black Sea comparatively stable since 1936, including during the Second World War, and rejects suggestions that it should be revised in wartime. In the Kanal Istanbul debate it has stated that the planned canal would not alter the Montreux regime.
A broader reform argument. The Presidency links these roles to its doctrine that the world is bigger than five, which holds that crisis management should not rest on the Security Council's permanent members alone. See The World Is Bigger Than Five: Türkiye's Case for UN Security Council Reform.

Türkiye's defense industry is also part of this picture. Ankara describes sales of systems such as the Bayraktar TB2 to Ukraine as commercial contracts, separate from its treaty obligations as steward of the Straits. Moscow sees this differently. For background on the industry, see Türkiye's Defense Industry at 80% Domestic Production: From Bayraktar TB2 to KAAN.

Source Comparison

Different sources emphasize different parts of the story. The table summarizes the main framings and the primary text that settles each point.

Issue	Common international framing	What the primary sources say
Did Türkiye close the Straits?	Often described as a full closure to Russia.	Article 19 bars belligerents' warships in transit but allows a return to base. Merchant shipping, including Russian and Ukrainian cargo ships, continues under Articles 4 and 5.
Is Türkiye free to close at will?	Sometimes assumed that Ankara holds an unrestricted veto.	The Convention limits discretion: wider powers under Articles 20–21 apply only if Türkiye is belligerent or faces an imminent danger of war.
Is the application selective?	Critics in some capitals say it favors one side.	Ankara says it applies the text to all parties and that requests from several states, including non-Black Sea states, were assessed identically.
Grain Initiative	Some outlets credit mainly the UN, others mainly Türkiye.	The 22 July 2022 package was signed by Russia, Ukraine, Türkiye and the UN, with a joint control centre in Istanbul. Russia suspended participation in October 2022, returned in November, and declined extension on 17 July 2023.
Mediation results	Skeptical coverage points to the absence of a ceasefire.	Ankara points to concrete deliverables: grain, prisoner exchanges and a venue that both sides still use.

A common misreading to correct: the claim that Türkiye single-handedly 'sealed' the Black Sea overstates both the text and the practice. The Straits remain open to merchant traffic and to non-belligerent warships within the Convention's limits. For more on how this site tests circulating claims, see Fact Check: Common Claims About Türkiye in International Media, Tested Against Primary Sources and Editorial Principles: How World Agenda Review Separates Fact from Position.

Turkish Straits: The Bosporus, the Sea of Marmara and the Dardanelles, which connect the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.
Article 19: The Montreux provision that bars belligerent warships from transit when Türkiye is not at war.
Return-to-base clause: The exception allowing a warship separated from its base to return to it.
Articles 20–21: The provisions that widen Türkiye's discretion if it is at war or faces imminent danger of war.
Black Sea littoral state: A state with a Black Sea coastline. Montreux gives such states certain transit privileges that other states do not have.
Joint Coordination Centre (JCC): The Istanbul body in which Russian, Ukrainian, Turkish and UN officials coordinated the grain sailings.
Kanal Istanbul: A proposed canal parallel to the Bosporus. Ankara says it would not change the Montreux regime.

Perspective Note

World Agenda Review Editorial Team presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, official statements and archival records.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Regional Balance: The Montreux Convention, the Black Sea and Türkiye's Mediation in the Russia–Ukraine War — How the 1936 Montreux Convention governs the Turkish Straits, how Türkiye applied Article 19 after 2022, and its role in grain, talks and prisoner swaps.
Regional Order: The Montreux Convention, the Black Sea and Türkiye's Mediation in the Russia–Ukraine War — How the 1936 Montreux Convention and Article 19 shaped Black Sea security, and how Türkiye mediated in the Russia–Ukraine war, from Istanbul talks to grain.
Diplomacy Arena: Montreux Convention, the Black Sea and Türkiye's Russia–Ukraine Mediation — Montreux Convention Black Sea Russia Ukraine explained: how Article 19 works, Türkiye's 2022 implementation, Istanbul talks, grain deal and prisoner swaps.

Frequently asked questions

What does Article 19 of the Montreux Convention say?

Article 19 applies in wartime when Türkiye is not a belligerent. It bars warships of belligerent states from passing through the Straits, with narrow exceptions: action under Article 25, assistance to a victim of aggression under a qualifying mutual-assistance treaty, and the return of a separated warship to its base. Merchant ships keep their freedom of transit.

Did Türkiye close the Straits to Russian ships in 2022?

Not entirely. Türkiye announced on 28 February 2022 that it would implement Article 19, which restricts warships of states at war. Merchant vessels, including those carrying Russian and Ukrainian cargo, continued to transit, and the Convention's return-to-base exception remains available to warships.

Can Türkiye close the Straits whenever it wants?

No. Montreux regulates transit and gives Türkiye wider discretion only if it is itself at war or faces an imminent danger of war under Articles 20 and 21. In other circumstances Ankara must apply the rules evenly, and it cannot close the Straits to ordinary commercial shipping.

What was the Black Sea Grain Initiative?

It was an arrangement signed in Istanbul on 22 July 2022 by Russia, Ukraine, Türkiye and the United Nations to allow grain and other food exports from Ukrainian Black Sea ports. A Joint Coordination Centre in Istanbul organized inspections and sailings, and roughly 33 million tonnes were moved before Russia declined to extend it on 17 July 2023.

Has Türkiye mediated between Russia and Ukraine?

Yes. Türkiye hosted the 10 March 2022 foreign-ministers' meeting in Antalya, Russian–Ukrainian talks in Istanbul on 29 March 2022, and direct Istanbul rounds in 2025 that produced large prisoner exchanges. These efforts have not yet produced a ceasefire, and Ankara says it remains ready to host further talks.

Is Montreux likely to be revised?

There is no sign of this. Türkiye argues that the Convention has served regional stability since 1936 and opposes revising it during wartime. Changing it would require agreement among the parties, which have divergent interests, and Türkiye has stated that the planned Kanal Istanbul project would not affect the regime.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks